Democrats, Republicans react differently to Obama's 'horses and ...

WASHINGTON -- The most talked about line from Monday night's presidential debate was President Barack Obama's comment that "we also have fewer horses and bayonets." It was in response to Republican Mitt Romney's statement that the U.S. now has fewer ships than at anytime since World war I and that he would change that as president as part of his plan to increase military spending.

Members of Congress reacted to Obama's rebuttal along party lines, with Republicans quick to say a strong Navy, with a robust fleet of ships, is vital to keeping the United States strong. Democrats said the president was just making the point, effectively in their view, that technological advances mean the U.S. can do more with less.

Obama's point at Monday's debate was that military needs have changed as the United States developed more advanced and sophisticated ships and battle systems.

"You mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916," Obama said. "Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military's changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers, where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines. The nature of our military's changed. And so the question is not a game of Battleship where we're counting ships. It's what are our capabilities."

Rep. Steve Scalise, R-Jefferson, took offense to the president's comments.

"It's alarming just how out of touch President Obama continues to be when it comes to the dangerous world that we live in, and it's unconscionable that he is more focused on wasting taxpayers' hard-earned money on failed green energy companies like Solyndra than ensuring the strength of America's Navy," Scalise said.

Rep. Cedric Richmond, D-New Orleans, said he's heard the criticism by some Republicans, but he views the bayonets and horses remark as a "good line" that made his point that Romney's call for increased military spending isn't well thought out at a time of large deficits.

"I know that there are some Republicans trying to take it out of context, but I think he was saying that the way we build things changed and so does the way you invest in equipment," Richmond said. "We have all these state-of-the-art ships, many of them build in Louisiana, so we don't need as many ships overall. It's a compliment to the quality of shipbuilding in Louisiana."

The biggest ticket military ship item for Metro New Orleans has been the construction of amphibious assault support ships, known as LPD 17s, which cost $1.6 billion each. They were built primarily at Avondale Shipyards.

But as production is phased out, Huntington Ingalls, which has had the contract to build the vessels, is stopping ship construction at Avondale and switching it to Mississippi.

Bollinger Shipyards in Lockport recently won a $250 million contact to build six Fast Response Cutters for the Coast Guard. But in a lawsuit, still pending in New Orleans federal court, the U.S. Justice Department accuses Bollinger of falsifying data that led the Coast Guard to contract with the firm to lengthen eight deepwater cutters - all of which turned out to be "unseaworthy and unusable."

Erin Donar, spokeswoman for Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., reacted to the debate by talking about the senator's support for shipbuilding in her home state.

"In every budget climate, Sen. Landrieu works tirelessly to keep Louisiana's shipbuilders employed, including a recently secured $212 million contract to build ship to shore connectors for the Navy in southeast Louisiana," Donar said.

Source: http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/10/dems_republicans_react_differe.html

hawaii weather the jerk lake havasu halo 4 jewel san francisco earthquake san francisco earthquake